Read our best practice article to learn common BOM mistakes that might be costing your business and how to reduce BOM mistakes with the help of Cloud PLM.
The utilization of phantom BOMs presents many advantages and disadvantages, rendering them a valuable instrument in specific manufacturing and design scenarios.
Phantom BOMs are particularly advantageous when there is an intermediate grouping of components that are not required as distinct inventory items, or when the subassembly notion is rational for design clarity but impractical in reality.
In a PLM environment, phantom BOMs are an integral part of the product master definition. The phantom structure is preserved for clarity, version control, and design rationale. Upon the occurrence of changes via ECO/ECN, phantom definitions and their subordinate components are subject to version control. The propagation of changes must guarantee the validity of phantom logic, adherence to component lifecycles, and the accuracy of routing merges. Oversight of the quality management system may be necessary in regulated environments to guarantee that phantom transitions, removals, or alterations are properly documented and auditable.
Phantom BOMs facilitate the maintenance of organized and manageable BOM structures during the new product introduction (NPI) process. You establish logical groups of components initially (as phantom subassemblies) without necessitating a commitment to distinct production phases or inventories for each subassembly. As the design evolves, these phantom groupings minimize BOM clutter while facilitating the reuse of component sets across variation configurations. In BOM management, phantom BOMs facilitate modular design while eliminating the burden of additional inventory and the intricacies of production planning.
With the use of BOMs in manufacturing systems (ERP, MES), the phantom BOM logic is “flattened” during execution—components are separated, and the phantom is removed from operational processes. As a result, phantom BOMs function as an intermediary between the conceptual BOM structure and the execution-level BOM.
Utilize a phantom BOM when the subassembly does not need to be inventoried or monitored separately, and it is more efficient to integrate its components into the parent manufacturing order. If the subassembly requires autonomous inventory management, cost regulation, or serviceability, a standard bill of materials (BOM) is more suitable.
Phantom BOMs do not, by default, deplete the inventory of the phantom item. The system bypasses the phantom and solely utilizes its subordinate components within the parent manufacturing order.
When the production order is approximated, any routing actions set for the phantom are integrated into the parent’s routing. The operations are renumbered and appended to execute within the overarching parent manufacturing sequence.
Yes. In a cost rollup, phantom assemblies are typically regarded as standard assemblies for their cost contributions; the costs associated with the phantom (such as materials, labor, etc.) are incorporated into the parent item. The phantom’s burden, or overhead, is often set to zero to avoid distorting cost stacking.