Despite these obstacles, CTO is a persuasive solution for firms seeking to provide flexibility while maintaining operational efficiency.
The CTO relies significantly on a comprehensive product lifecycle management (PLM) system to define and version configuration models, option classes, rules, and modular components. The PLM assumes control over the definition of the configurable product. In regulated sectors, quality management system overlays guarantee that configuration rules, traceability, and variant decisions are subject to audit and governed by quality protocols. A modification in a module or option must systematically propagate through the associated configuration logic.
During the new product introduction (NPI) process, the configuration framework, modules, option regulations, dependencies, and constraints are established. That structure serves as the foundation for all the different variants. Instead of generating an individual BOM for each version during development, the CTO configuration model manages variant differentiation. This optimizes BOM management by consolidating variant logic instead of expanding static BOMs.
Moreover, during product launches, modifications to modules or options must be meticulously controlled to ensure that variant resolution stays accurate and aligned with production processes.
In MTO, products are constructed from the ground up following receipt of the order and may necessitate complete design or fabrication. In CTO, the components are predetermined, and customization is limited to selecting from legitimate options, facilitating expedited resolution and the use of pre-engineered modules.
A configured item is the outcome of implementing configuration rules on the base model and option classes, resulting in a distinct product variant for production or fulfillment.
Companies should consider configure-to-order (CTO) when faced with a high volume of product variants, making it impractical to maintain inventory for every possible configuration, and when customers require customization within manageable parameters. Engaging a chief technology officer is particularly beneficial when the costs and complexities associated with full-scale customization (engineer-to-order) become prohibitive.
The chief technology officer requires a product configurator (rule engine), integration with product lifecycle management (for variant logic and component definitions), enterprise resource planning (ERP), and supply chain systems (for fulfillment and procurement), as well as precise orchestration of manufacturing/assembly systems to dynamically generate work orders.